Its been years since I've written anything about literature (or even thought about lit. for that matter) but of late, I've been thinking more and more about my days in Loyola..
The life of a literature student is something else. You bunk most classes (since a lot of those profs don't really teach you much anyways), you drink several cups of coffee, discuss beat poetry and the absurdist tradition while going out for a smoke at the nearest potti kadai, you skip lunch and head to the library, where you turn the pages of huge moth-eaten volumes that have last been checked out in 1939 (this is no exaggeration - the Loyola library has a copy of Hamlet that was last taken out in that very year). The musty smell of those books are enough to give you a thrill down your spine - because you suddenly feel like you're connected to something bigger than yourself.. That people who have lived and died have turned the same pages and read the same words...
The best part about the library is the silence. There is something magical about silence, undeniably. It leaves you no option but to think... and when your thought process is being galvanized by the greatest minds, as they critique the greatest writers, you suddenly feel elevated to that level.
But the greatest part about the whole exercise is the process of discovering layers. I think when you discover new layers of meaning in a literary text, that is the moment of convergence between math and english, which are (unjustly in my opinion) often set as polar opposites. When you discover, to take a well quoted example, that Robert Frost, when speaking about stopping by the woods on a snowy evening, was actually referring to the feeling you get when you're in the twilight of your life, and you know you don't have very long to go, you feel that thrill of discovery. As though you were the first person in the world who realised what the poet is actually talking about. And i always feel, this is similar to figuring out the chords to a song on your own on the guitar, particularly when you're just learning how to play, and its all new to you. Similar to when you solve a math equation without the help of a guide....
equally pleasurable, is finding someone to discuss lit. with. Craig and i would often go to the bus stop opposite loyola, and our discussion over a smoke (and possibly tea) could range from the curious accent that some of our profs adopted when reading out a text, to symbolism in t. s. eliot's wasteland, or the brilliant statement made by oku onuora when he wrote his poems in some caribbean creole instead of conforming, and writing poetry in english.
occasionally, you'd get a lecture from one of the better profs, that would kindle the fire within you... fr. peter francis, for example, who breathed life into shakespeare's characters with a brilliant impersonation of Falstaff... it's hard to get that humour unless you see it, after all...
britto, who would slouch to class and teach literature as though it were lab chemistry. he would jot down every point on the board, entirely from memory, in the most matter of fact way possible... he almost seemed bored by the whole thing, but somehow, just his thorough knowledge of the subject and the precision of his method left you wanting more..
when i started this post, i was intending to write something about my thoughts on existentialism - but my intended introduction has formed itself into a post... the nostalgia just caught me unawares.
but what to do... that is the life - being a lit. student.. living everyday with the greatest minds the world produced... i hope i can go back to it some day.
24 comments:
I can relate, man. In my case, as a visual artist, an education makes the difference between merely viewing a painting or watching a film or using a website interface, and actually engaging with it at a conceptual and functional level. Leading, of course, to the next level of actually being able to qualitatively determine a good work from a mediocre one.
I had this teacher who once told me that any person goes through the following stages in his learning and life: unconscious incompetence (where you're terrible at what you do and you dont even realize it) --> conscious incompetence (when you suddenly realize how bad you're work really is) --> unconscious competence (when you rectify your shortcomings and get decent at what you do but you dont really know it yet), and finally --> conscious competence
(when you're bloody good at what you do and you bloody well know it). A good education, I think, will at least get you upto the second stage. Which is more than anyone can ask.
eyefry,
i totally agree with you (or your teacher).
tho i would say, that education takes you to the first stage, and then, work takes you to the second...
i mean, when you're fresh out of school, and you move into college, you think you're the cream of the crop..
only once you start working do you realise how little you know.
the strange part is, when you're in the second stage, you have zero tolerence for people in the first... maybe that comes with time.
however, my nostalgia for literature has nothing to do with becoming better as a writer, or a critic, or anything... it's just the thrill of discovery, the joy of reading... even the smell of old volumes that somehow makes you feel you're part of something larger...
the whole package, in short.
*sigh*
Saar, The nearest I came to falling in love with Poetry was when i realised that in "the road not taken", the poet intentionally does not reveal his current state of mind, ie you can never figure out whether he regretted taking that road or is happy with it. The poem would still hold, whichever way the poet felt in hindsight, if my memory serves me right.
But with my training as a journalist, if I were to read Frost now, I'd probably wonder why he doesn't say it straight, and quickly! I know you won't agree with me on this... :-)
as a journalist, i would agree.
as a student of literature, i would say, 'maybe the poet himself doesn't know'.
Hi Abhinav, what you wrote about math and literature reminded me of a superb quote by Russell. It used to be - written almost crudely on a yellowish chart paper, stuck on the wall just next to black board in one of the classrooms at my college. I had forgotten all about it - and managed to find it from the net. Here goes:
"Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty – a beauty cold and austere, without appeal to any part of our weaker nature, without the gorgeous trappings of painting or music, yet sublimely pure, and capable of a stern perfection such as only the greatest art can show. The true spirit of delight, the exaltation, the sense of being more than man, which is the touchstone of the highest excellence, is to be found in mathematics as surely as in poetry."
And, that was a superb description of two different approaches - not just to teaching literature - but to literature itself.
Also liked your response to Bharat sir's comment "I'd probably wonder why he doesn't say it straight, and quickly!"
Here's what i think. (Nothing new about looking at it this way, but) the purpose of any art - music, drama, poetry, cinema, novel, dance - is to create an atmosphere in which the reader/viewer (i was about to write, the consumer of that art) experiences certain emotions.
In journalism you tell it as it is, in literature you create the atmosphere and leave the rest to the reader. This is one reason why literature lasts longer, but a newspaper becomes a wastepaper the next day. Also a reason why literature allows you to see multiple layers of meaning.
I should have added 'Telling it as it is', can be a literary technique as well. Ashokamitran's Thanneer is a great example.
ramnath,
thanks for your comment and that great quote. there is an undeniable beauty about math. i was just reading isaac asimov's essay, 'a piece of pi' yesterday, about the origination and evolution of the concept of Pi over the years - and it was absolutely fascinating.
anyway, solving a math equation is basically the same as discovering new layers isn't it? I mean, there's this mess of numbers and symbols in front of you, but making sense of it is the exciting bit (btw, i was never much good at it, i barely passed my math exam, but i still did enjoy what little bit i learnt)
as for literature, and 'telling it as it is' - sometimes that's the best way of writing literature. i would point at ernest hemingway as the best possible example. sometimes it doesn't work, in which case it becomes boring - like Farewell to Arms - but when it does work, like in Old Man and The Sea', you get one of the greatest novels in the history of english literature.
but then, there's a bit more to literature than just style. choice of topic, the situation etc.
how's that for job satisfaction?
MMmmm.... Nice man.... I mean its a beautiful thing...literature....
antickpix,
not denying it.. i'm fed up. hope none of my superiors stumble upon this.
y-shoe... hmmm.. not sure what you're saying.. but if in earnest, yes lit is fantastic. but sometimes, you wonder if its pointless. there's no denying tho, that its a lot of fun
hmm completely true! i have a similar memory to almost every single one in the post... especially the excitement of discovery. you know that what you've just "discovered" might be the most cliched and traditional interpretation of a poem or that the poet probably never meant anything even remotely close to what you read into the poem but it's all the same thrill. the feeling that at least a thousand minds have read the same words, been shaped by them, is a thought that never fails to occur to me every time I read a great work of literature.
hey jan,
long time no see.. very true..
but despite the fact that millions of people have read the same poem, when you read it it somehow becomes very private, and very much your own.
Hey abhinav, this post of yours reminds me of a story. the story of a pony without blinkers. I blv initially men rode on horses without blinkers. Whenever a horse saw something on its way it would run to it with excitement. So the riders found it cumbersome to ride a horse, because it would deviate every now and then. to stop it from deviation they started putting blinkers. I think litt students are like that, we get excited and deviate happily. hehehe
sleepy,
for all my years of literature and studying metaphors, similes and analogies, i didn't get that one. how are we like horses without blinkers? don't get it all.
anyways, thanks for stopping by. cheers.
But the greatest part about the whole exercise is the process of discovering layers. I think when you discover new layers of meaning in a literary text, that is the moment of convergence between math and english..
the english meets math meets alcoholism meets extreme-adventure/racing-car/high-dive
idea... spot on! patterns... a common mould (sp?) found somewhere along the line, as we deconstruct towards the elemental state, and then further. atoms behaving like stars behaving like people. we explode or we implode...
we were talking about 'indianization of english' in class (ykno!)the other day, and the conversation led to the contempt of english-speaking, educated, like us lot... the same contempt exists in any person who sees himself as 'competent' in any society...
if you're a brown guy with a white girl, i guess noone might see you as abnormal, or meybe they might... you're concerned only cos you don't want anyone being disturbed by you... (to be loved)
eliot says criticism's as important as the air you breathe... but then criticism (awareness of things)+ a need to have ppl love you = self conscious feeling. i guess perhaps one day one realizes to make a distinction between acceptance and love (not just the romantic sort).
but having said all this, i'll be blurred in my mind when its time to act...
i guess thats why its nice to read other people's stuff... when you realize others are capable of thinking 'those thoughts' as well, you feel safe and at home... or an excitement of having found a home after having walked around a great deal, looking for one. like in a conversation when you decide to stop and hear the other person out regardless of the load of rubbish their story's weighed down by.
i guess a journalist you say it plainly cos u need to tell everyone... break down and get beyond the walls between wavelengths that are coated with layers of contempt (superiority? insecurity?). but sometimes you jus cant say certain things... it feels like running away from cover during a cross-fire... naked... and its natural to feel sick by that intensity... so then comes art? twisting into a shape bearing resemblance to the mould (sp?) of the subject, and not it directly. newspapers dont stay too relevant beyond a day unless chunks of history are being made... but art taps the mould (sp?) ...
i was thinking for differences and thought, perhaps a mathematician discovers whereas am artist invents... its closer to say that they both 'reveal' maybe the great universal truth, or a mistaken perception of it, or the feeling inspired by it.... even the most fictitious of fiction is some reaction, revealed...
i'm finally reading god of small things cps its part of our course... a.roy talks bout how its far tougher to keep a story together and far easier to break it down... it CAN work the other way round as well. fanaticism. an extreme in either direction seems to lead to a point of stagnation. we start wearing blinkers...
i'm rambling like hell!!
visit post at my place if im rambling through sense...
sorry i forgot to put that first para in quotes and observe that you climaxed your post there...
im really drunk and sleep-deprived... so sorry for putting u thru that if u did read it.... cant care for grammar right now... cya at u'r play... thinking of make a play-day of sunday and watching urs and drama-fest, both
Abhu... I wrote a little opinion post. Check this out. http://maqamatics.blogspot.com/2007/06/love-and-war-in-time-of-call-era.html and let me know what you felt.
"... fr. peter francis, for example, who breathed life into shakespeare's characters with a brilliant impersonation of Falstaff... it's hard to get that humour unless you see it, after all...
britto, who would slouch to class and teach literature as though it were lab chemistry. he would jot down every point on the board, entirely from memory, in the most matter of fact way possible... he almost seemed bored by the whole thing, but somehow, just his thorough knowledge of the subject and the precision"
Abhinav,
Good post to return to your blog after a long time. In fact, I just visited college a few days back and you know what the department has, eventually, more doctorates... if that matters at all. You are bang on about Fr. Peter and Britto... Though I did not have the privilege of doing Shakespeare under the former, I did criticism under the latter and it was one of the few classes I enjoyed. Add to that Mr. De silva's classes - which were my personal favourite; there was a tears' gathering when he retired last year you wouldn't believe - I guess that makes the rarely interesting sessions at the department.
About the library... the musty smells... the great minds... the engaging silence... the galvanisation of one's thoughts processes... and the feeling that some of our own teachers have grown up on those very books we hold on our hands... too true indeed. Thank you indeed!
I could truly relate to it as an ex-Loyolite and as a junior compatriot of the department.
abhinav, my profession has screwed me over and my prev habits of checking out two of my fav blogs (one of them is urs) is dying!
I got back home in time and while looking for some random data, i found ur blog's link in my fav's... and decided to take a look and as usual I am not disappointed!
The latest one abt Loyola & Lit... excellent piece of work. I can't relate to lit nor do I remember much of Loyola. The only discussions I ever had with any of my friends on issues within the lecture rooms were if ever on how to solve a corporate accounting issue... Suddenly, I think I am not doing anything worthwhile... haa haa!
Hope all's well with u... keep up the good writing!
"A fine visual document" - sorry to give such a jejune title to a fine collection of pictures!lol. You were right, makes greater sense - and steeps your sensibility in verbal and picturesque descriptive delights (respectively)- to go through Manasi's last post and this one side by side!
That's all I have for now, my friend! See you around!
I am the sort of guy who enjoys to taste new stuff. Currently I am making my hold photovoltaic panels. I'm managing it all alone without the aid of my staff. I'm using the internet as the only way to acheive that. I saw a truly awesome site that explains how to create pv panels and wind generators. The website explains all the steps needed for constructing solar panels.
I am not sure about how correct the information given there iz. If some people over here who had experience with these things can have a look and give your feedback in the thread it will be awesome and I'd extremely treasure it, cause I truly love [URL=http://solar-panel-construction.com]solar panel construction[/URL].
Thanks for reading this. U guys are great.
Post a Comment