There was this seminar I once went for. One man gets up and talks about his trip to China. Marco Polo's reports in the 1700s (?) couldn't have been filled with more awed wonder - he talks of malls and sky scrapers and causeways and autobahns, and everyone there, including myself, eyes glaze over (in a good way) and we all dream of this fairytale land And then he goes - "In China, if they decide to build a bridge, they build it. It's up and running in a matter of months." And then pounding the table "WHY DOES IT TAKE INDIA SO LONG!" Anyone who's been stuck in traffic in Taramani road will empathise surely - that road they've been working on for 18 months now, and nowhere close to completion.
The next speaker simply said, "Well, that's China. India is a democracy - if we decide to build a bridge, there could be a slum there, and those people have to be relocated, if there's a river there, and environmentalists protest, then that has to be taken into account."
It was the most chastening experience, to be so carried away by one speaker, and then brought right down to earth by the other. I felt quite like one of those jackasses in Roman history who stood around and cheered during Brutus' speech, and then tooled off with the others to kill him post Marc Anthony's speech.
I think I agree with Speaker 2. China, whatever it declares itself as these days, seems to have this really wierd dichotomy - Communist politics, capitalist economy. Basically, they ride rough shod over whoever opposes the so called interests of the state. When urbanisation became a problem in China, they introduced what basically are visas for people in the rural segment which they need to obtain to move into the city. Simple solution, except perhaps for rural farmers whose livelihoods are eaten away by the MNC agri businesses (as they are in India), except that unlike in India, they have to sit where they are.
But this isn't a feel good piece about being an Indian. Here, they come to the cities and become construction workers, which sucks ass, no doubt, but it beats starvation. I'm not saying we're great, but at least we have a mechanism up - when the Narmada dam was built, and tribals were getting screwed, noone gave a shit, and it needed someone like Medha Phatkar to go out there and stir things up - but at least there was a mechanism with which she could fight, and appeal to the Supreme Court, and get a ruling. Whether the ruling was favourable or not, at least there is a mechanism.
But of late I feel that India is heading dangerously in the China direction. I could be completely wrong, but I really think so. We're so desperate to push that stock index up, to - just - somehow - puuuussssshhhh that GDP up, that we're sacrificing a few things along the way. And not just starving farmers in Hyderabad, but your friends and mine - the BPO industry, for example, does not have an employee union. "They don't need one," says a friend of mine flippantly - he's an IT guy, and they just drive me MAD - and why don't they have one? Cos their American clients think it would be an added cost. So of course, since low cost is our selling point (don't listen to talk of Indian brainpower, and analytical capabilities) , we dispense with this rather unnecessary element. Do we need an employee union for BPOs after all? They're getting good money, they're happy.
But, the fact is, a suicide helpline gave out info that the maximum number of calls come from BPO employees. I think that warrants representation, I think they should be able to express the stress and work pressure and god knows what else through a proper mechanism, and not just through Rs 125 novels called 'One Night at a Call Center'.
So what is the solution?
Something someone once said to me was 'never depoliticise an issue', and I think that was the best advice I've received - you have to look at the political and social implications of everything. I find that today, my friends who are in business look at economies, and stock indices and feel very happy, but noone looks at the implications. I think the first step towards a solution is to look at those implications - and I'm definitely not saying I am good at it. For me, it has involved plodding through the paper, and switching (with a lot of angst) from VH1 to NDTV. But I feel I'm learning something everyday, and what joy can equal that?
19 comments:
Nicely put. Inspires me to read up some more on these poor downtrodden BPO types (and here I was thinking all sorts of contrary things about them...)
Hey, you work at ET, right?
Hey man (with apologies in advance for shamelessly using you as a middleman), tell your mum to take a look at this. An instructive conversation about her play, and therein, theatre in Chennai.
No, I work at Business Line, slightly distant second to ET in terms of circulation....
As for the BPO employees, well, I don't know much about them either to be honest, but was just trying to make a point. And tho i spoke kind of derisively about it, Chetan Bhagat's 'One Night at a Call Centre' is actually pretty good, a nice way of getting the inside story about BPOs.
And i'll def. pass the link on to mom.
Abhinav,
Check out this article. It's in line with your own stance...
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=2006031200370100.htm&date=2006/03/12/&prd=mag&
Trying this again:
www.thehindu.com/thehindu/mag/2006/03/12/stories/2006031200370100.htm
Yet to read Chetan Bhagat. I have a copy of his 'Five-Point-Someone' lying forlornly in some corner of my room, as yet untouched. Hope to find some time to read books again soon...
:(
p.s. Dear Sir, as per your request, the WV explanation has been duly proffered on our pages. We trust the information will be to your satisfaction. Regards, etc.
Feeling strangely disconnected. Sigh. I've got to go teach Marx to vacant
twentysomething midwesterners...
In the spirit of your posts, Abhinav, I've decided to make my Puma-clad posse write shoegazer/punk/britpop songs about Marx. In class (!). Commodify your dissent. Woohoo. Yeeeeeehaaaaa!
eyefry,
ah, i know the feeling! the only time i get to read books is from 10 onwards in the night, and i usually end up paying for it the next morning i.e. bleary eyed and snapping at everyone in the family.
i am one of those who doesn't function properly without eight hours of sleep!
five point someone is actually a good read too, though there is something a little jarring about bhagat's style which i can't quite put my finger on. maybe youll be able to help me out there once you get round to it.
f2f,
i am so flattered that i've inspired anyone to do anything... tho i'm struggling somewhat to commodify my dissent as you put it... marx in brit pop style? only in america can you get away with something like that.
Abhinav,
Stumbling on your blog is the best thing that happened to me (yeah I know my life's pathetic)...living in a shithole town full of white trash biker bars that serve bud and ALWAYS have Whitesnake blaring from the jukebox, teaching upstart brats in private school who can't write and don't care...
Anyway, your thoughtful rants (another oxymoron?) and stirring exchanges with eyefry and others give me hope. Oh and btw, what you mean you offended me "judging by [my] name"? A little pigeonholing here? Hmmmm? (In my head I'm doing Stuey's voice (Family Guy) when he quizzes Francis about the latter's unfinished novel:)
I don't like Bhagat's style. Its pretentious and crude somehow..I don't know can't put my finger on it..
Ah a fellow sleeper. I can;t fuction without 8 hrs of sleep and caffeine in the morning. No caffeine, no pretence at brain function.
If you do want to read something interesting then find a book called The Penelopiad by Margaret Atwood. Its a reworking of the Odyssey from the perspective of Penelope. Fascinating stuff.
f2f,
wow... thats quite a compliment... in fact, i slightly dont know what to say.
and hey 'f2f' - i made the obvious assumption, but do correct me if i'm wrong!
gitler,
i know what you mean, it's very crude, very hard to put your finger on why it doesn't work, as such. but personally, i think we need more writers who just write about things that are going on around without worrying too much about anything else.
what i find happens in the modern indian novel is that either its about middle class issues, which to my mind are not really issues (like the identity crisis that everyone's always on about) or they get incredibly worried that they're not addressing the issues of the millions of poverty stricken people and the like, and the result is some kind of pseudo sentimental 'oh the poor woman who gets beaten by a drunk husband everyday' kind of thing, which really doesn't sound genuine. let me make it clear that i'm not saying the woman thing is not an issue, i'm only saying they're not addressed all that well, because its really hard to do it for so many reasons.
I think good novels need to be about genuine experiences. i also think that i don't know enough on the subject to speak so authoritatively, so do take all of the above with a pinch of salt!
i wouldnt make a blog public and object to comments from strangers :)
and thanks!
heh, thanx... and yr blog really is very very cool... i was very tempted put 'very very cute' but thought you may not appreciate it!
I see what you mean. I started reading Bhagat last night, stopped halfway through the first chapter and decided not to continue. Everagain. Same thing happened with Dan Brown's famous mega-bullshitter. There's something about badly worded mass-panderers that I loathe...
lol... thanx buddy, you said what i was too diplomatic to say.
but then i don't know, of late i can't read any bestsellers... i couldn't even get thro fifty pages of crichton's state of fear, and i've always been a big fan.
Not exactly topic-related, but I encourage everyone here to go to the following link (cut-and-paste URL, please) to see absolutely brilliant comedian stephen colbert seriously rag on bush and co at the white house. the speech got a chilly reception and little coverage in the wimpy mainstream media but the blogosphere is buzzing nationwide. colbert started out at jon stewart's daily show on comedy central and now hosts the colbert report--brilliant political satire--on the same channel. please do check it out; it's amazing that no news organization has been abel to mount the kind of political critique under the bush regime's muzzle than comedians stewart, colbert, and dave chappelle have in the last few years.
Link below:
http://www.chris-floyd.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=621
You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it
Buspirone label fda free buspirone buspirone Does buspirone work Naked hispanic teens girls Antidepressant chemical structure Theatrical contact lenses theatre Real estate financing in california contact eye lens pink Facts about wellbutrin Best data fax modem software Financial advisor v2 18 low prices maternity clothes
Post a Comment